Topological Q-JSON Protocol (TQP): A Hybrid Architecture for Deterministic Quantum Data Transfer

Vikash Kumar; Aarav Pal; Rashmi  Shekhar

doi:10.70454/JRICST.2026.30402

Authors

Vikash Kumar Amity Institute of Information Technology, Amity University Patna, Patna, India. Author https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7140-3202
Aarav Pal Amity Institute of Information Technology, Amity University Patna, Patna, India. Author
Rashmi Shekhar Amity Institute of Information Technology, Amity University Patna, Patna, India. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7864-6448

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70454/JRICST.2026.30402

Keywords:

Quantum Networking, QKD, Stabilizer Formal-ism, JSON API, Effective Field Theory, Colored Multi graph

Abstract

The transition from classical networking to a secure Quantum Internet is currently bottlenecked by the exponential degradation of fragile quantum states when transmitted over long physical distances. Traditional models rely on quantum teleportation and physical entanglement swapping, which are highly susceptible to channel noise and require massive hardware redundancy. The Topological Q-JSON Protocol (TQP) proposes a novel, hybrid network architecture that bypasses the need to physically transmit complex quantum states through noisy fiber-optic channels. TQP utilizes a bifurcated model: it establishes an unconditionally secure classical channel using Differential Phase Shift Quantum Key Distribution (DPS-QKD), and transmits a classical, machine-readable “topological recipe” formatted as a JSON payload. The receiving node uses this payload to locally reconstruct a deterministic, hype rentangled cluster state within a gauge-invariant subspace. This architecture bridges the gap between high-level software engineering and low-level physical quantum hardware.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Wehner, D. Elko’s, and R. Hanson, “Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead,” *Science*, vol. 362, no. 6412, Art. no. eaam9288, 2018.

[2] F. Vista, “Quantum-aided modeling and design techniques for advanced wireless network architectures,” 2024.

[3] S. Dour and A. Chuan, “Quantum information constraints from early quantum postulates: The Planck-Einstein perspective on no-cloning and quantum security,” in *Merging Quantum Cloning and Block chain Solutions for Health Informatics*. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2026, pp. 83–120.

[4] N. K. Pataki, S. Chaudhary, Sanpete, and B. Kasseri, “Phase encoded quantum key distribution up to 380 km in standard telecom grade fiber enabled by baseline error optimization,” *Scientific Reports*, vol. 13, Art. No. 15868, 2023

[5] Lee, A. T. Castillo, C. Whitehall, and R. Donaldson, “Quantum bit error rate timing jitter dependency on multi-mode fibers,” *Optics Express*, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 6076–6087, 2023.

[6] H. Hisami, R. Brighten, X. Zhan, J. Moth, and T. Rabczuk, “Optimal fiber content and distribution in fiber-reinforced solids using a reliability and NURBS based sequential optimization approach,” *Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization*, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 99–112, 2015.

[7] A.Hanna, S. Maunder, A. Jain, and D. K. Singh, “Quantum BER estimation modeling and analysis for satellite-based quantum key distribution scenarios,” *IET Quantum Communication*, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 157–163, 2024.

[8] D. Elko’s, J. Martinez-Mateo, and V. Martin, “Secure rate-adaptive reconciliation,” in *Proc. 2010 Int. Sump. Information Theory & Its Applications*, Oct. 2010, pp. 179–184.

[9] O. J. E. Maloney, “Information and entropy in quantum theory,” arrive preprint quant-ph/0411172, 2004.

[10] T. C. Wei, J. T. Barreiro, and P. G. Kuwait, “Hyper entangled Bell-state analysis,” *Physical Review A*, vol. 75, no. 6, Art. No. 060305, 2007.

[11] C. Singh and J. MITRE, “Composite system reliability evaluation using state space pruning,” *IEEE Transactions on Power Systems*, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 471–479, 2002.

[12] S. Kumar, A. Jain, and A. Parsec, “Adaptive resource-aware virtual machine placement in cloud computing for optimizing performance and cost efficiency,” *Journal of Computers, Mechanical and Management*, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 228–246, 2026, doe: 10.57159/jcmm.5.3.261068.

[13] T. Gephardt, “Sheaf representation learning,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, 2023.

[14] A Singh, A. Sophia, L. Esmaeilifar, R. Valivarthi, N. Sinclair, M. Spiropulu, and D. Bola, “Photonic quantum information with time-bins: Principles and applications,” arrive preprint arXiv:2507.08102, 2025.

[15] L. Ago, M. Li, A. Bonita, W. Zhou, and S. Yu, “M-Dimension: Multi-characteristics based routing protocol in human associated delay-tolerant networks with improved performance over one-dimensional classic models,” *Journal of Network and Computer Applications*, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1285–1296, 2012.

[16] A.V. D. Shaft, “Robust nonlinear control. Port-controlled Hamiltonian systems: Towards a theory for control and design of nonlinear physical systems,” vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 91–98, 2000. ** [Publication details incomplete; verify source.]**

[17] J. Combos, D. F. Lecher, A. Bermudez, M. Muller, and E. Rico, “Noise-aware variation eigensolvers: A dissipative route for lattice gauge theories,” *PRX Quantum*, vol. 5, no. 3, Art. No. 030340, 2024.

[18] M. D. Schwartz, *Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model*. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

[19] A Zee, *Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell*, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2010.

[20] V. Kumar, A. Joshi, G. Taker, N. Chatham, and R. K. Singh, “Understanding quantum computing: From qubits to quantum algorithms,” in *Quantum Machine Learning in Industrial Automation*. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 117–133.